In this blog series what is free speech, freedom of
the press, and the evils of dehumanization have been explored. This creates the need to examine the opposing
sides of the issue of the language of dehumanization. While nobody will truly argue that
dehumanization is a good thing it can be argued that it is the lesser of two
evils when pitted against censorship often popularly referred to as “political
correctness.” It must also be examined
if “political correctness” is a negative force that will destroy society or if
the movement is beneficial to society.
Within American society there are popular terms
applied to censorship to include “political correctness”, “big brother state”,
and “socialism.” Each of these terms are
hyperbolic in a sense, taking the listener to an extreme emotion rather than a
rational discussion of the topic. What
is the concerns of political correctness and the dangers it creates within
society? Politically conservative
columnist Tim Wildmon wrote “Political correctness is the
practice of refusing to acknowledge the truth or the facts of a situation
because your words may be considered offensive to some people. This is not the
same as being purposefully rude or hurtful although some may interpret it that
way.” (Political Correctness: Dangerous Abandonment of Common Sense). In his assessment words that dehumanize
should be protected because they are words of facts, he says “Facts and statistics
don't create a false "stereotype." However, stereotypes are the basis
of dehumanization of groups within society and are historically dangerous. This is Jon Stewart talking about political
correctness within the political system within the country (note some adult
language used).
NPR Commentator Gene
Demby wrote an article examining research by Cornell University that shows the
positive aspects of political correctness.
The findings he reported were “The researchers'
takeaway: By imposing a PC environment, they had made it easier for men and
women to speak their minds in mixed company. They had "reduced the
uncertainty" that can come with interacting with someone from the opposite
sex.” (What Research Says about the Consequences of PC Culture). Basically, the PC culture removes the bully
in the room who prevents the inclusion of all within a group. Words of dehumanization are toxic within
society and are a roadblocks to advancement.
They take groups of people and isolate them devaluing not only their
ideas but rob them of their humanity.
This research shows that thinking about what you are going to say is
more productive than words without thought.
Both authors agree that political correctness impacts
communication, they clearly disagree on if that impact is positive or
negative. I think it is better to choose
your words carefully rather than try to defend poorly worded arguments. In my next blog I will take a look at
historical outcomes of the use of dehumanizing language.
Word Count: 468
Works Cited:
Demby, Gene. "What Research Says About The Consequences Of PC Culture." NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 13 July 2016.
Demby, Gene. "What Research Says About The Consequences Of PC Culture." NPR. NPR, n.d. Web. 13 July 2016.
"Political Correctness: Dangerous Abandonment of
Common Sense." Political Correctness: Dangerous Abandonment of Common
Sense. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 July 2016.
"Jon Stewart Donald Trump(NEW)." YouTube. YouTube, 2016. Web. 13 July 2016.
"Jon Stewart Donald Trump(NEW)." YouTube. YouTube, 2016. Web. 13 July 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment